Monday, July 21, 2008

Scars of Evolution - David Attenborough

A BBC Radio 4 documentary presented by Sir David Attenborough. Broadcasted on April 12, 2005 and April 19, 2005.

Scars of Evolution looks at the history and current status of the 'aquatic ape hypothesis' (AAH), first proposed over 45 years ago by Sir Alister Hardy, then elaborated and developed by Elaine Morgan and others.

Part 1
The series starts by looking at the history of the AAH and other competing theories of human origins - and at the prevailing ideas about early human evolution in 1960 when Hardy first raised the tentative question: Was man more aquatic in the past? Programme one considers Raymond Dart's Taung Child discovery and the ensuing savannah theory of human origins, as popularised by Robert Ardrey and Desmond Morris; the reaction to Hardy's radical alternative and to Elaine Morgan's bestseller: Descent of Woman.

Part 2
The second programme looks at the evidence that has accumulated in the last 5 - 10 years which seems to be driving the anthropological herd inexorably down to the water's edge. It includes reports on brain evolution, highlighting the essential fatty acids and nutrients that can only be sourced in the marine food chain; the global coastal migrations of early hominids, including major water crossings 1 million years ago; diving response and voluntary breath-control as semi-aquatic pre-adaptation for speech and some new and intriguing research findings that seem to indicate that water-births may be a very ancient human adaptation indeed.

File Size: 50 MB
Format: MP3, 128 kbps


Anthrosciguy said...

Ironic that this radio program is being touted on a site which says it posts material also against pseudo-science; this particular show was not David Attenborough's finest hour in science. I've studied the evidence given for the aquatic ape idea for over a decade now and on my site devoted to critiquing it have a page on the BBC Radio show. The direct link is: Notes on BBC Radio 4 program

BlindW@cher said...

Honestly, I didn't listen to whole program. I trusted the name of Sir David Attenborough. Thank you very much for the critique about the hypothesis.

Anonymous said...

Yes, you have some fine pro/con tables on your site - unfortunately without providing any sources! ;-/

So as always for us non-scientists, it's about who you prefer to believe... it's really time this gets taken up seriously.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...